|
Plantages van snelgroeiende eucalyptusbomen doen waterlopen
uitdrogen en verlagen de grondwaterspiegel waardoor in het zuiden lokale
gemeenschappen zonder water komen te zitten. Ook in koudere klimaatzones hebben
snelgroeiende bomen meer water nodig. Dit leidt ertoe dat inheemse bossen en
andere ecosystemen in Europa en Noord Amerika verdwijnen. De aanplant van
transgene bomen voor biobrandstof vraagt om uitgestrekte gebieden – gebieden
die van oudsher in gebruik zijn voor voedselproductie.
Zij die de transgene soorten ontwikkelen hebben weinig oog
voor de ecologische gevolgen van hun producten.
Sweden:
Research Into GE Trees Risks Irreversible Damage to Forest A Swedish scientist
is leading the way in GE tree research into flowering. The risks to the world’s
forests are enormous.
Professor Ove Nilsson is the star of genetically engineered tree research in
Sweden. Nilsson and his research team at the Umeå Plant Science Centre won the
race to identify the gene that controls plants’ flowering allowing them to
produce genetically engineered trees which flower in weeks, instead of years.
In 2005, the journal Science declared it one of the most important discoveries
of the year.[1]
”Finding the start button for tree flowering means that we understand the
underlying molecular processes. It means that we can press the start button
instead of awaiting the natural course of things. In this way we can get trees
to flower when we want them to,” Nilsson explains in an interview with Eva
Krutmeijer on the Linnaeus300 website.[2]
Selective breeding of trees takes many generations, especially with cold
climate trees such as spruce and aspen, which flower after 10 to 15 years. One
of the reasons that eucalyptus is so popular as a plantation tree species is
that it flowers in two or three years, allowing rapid breeding for
characteristics such as fast growth and straight stems.[3]
Nilsson’s quick flowering trees allow him to work on producing faster growing
trees for cold climates. Nilsson argues that faster growing trees and trees
which will grow in colder climates are needed to meet increasing demand.
Nilsson doesn’t even consider the possibility of reducing consumption. ”The
only way we are going to cope with rising demand is increase forest
productivity,” he told the Sydney Morning Herald in July 2007.[4]
Nilsson isn’t really talking about increasing ”forest productivity”. He’s
talking about increasing productivity from industrial tree plantations. The
fast growing eucalyptus plantations that Nilsson admires have dried out streams
and lowered water tables, leaving local communities without water supplies in
many countries in the South. Faster growing trees in cold climates would also
need more water. Faster growing tree monocultures have already replaced many
native forests and other ecosystems in Europe and North America. Growing GE
trees for biofuel, another area of interest for Nilsson, would require vast
areas of land - land which is often already in use for food production, for
example.[5]
In recognition of his research, Nilsson will be awarded the Marcus Wallenberg
Prize in Autumn this year.[6] The prize indicates who will benefit from
Nilsson’s research - the pulp and paper industry and the biofuel industry. The
Marcus Wallenberg Prize was set up in 1980 by Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags, now pulp
and paper giant Stora Enso. The prize is named after Marcus Wallenberg, a
banker, industrialist and chairman of Stora’s Board of Directors.[7] While the
Marcus Wallenberg Prize claims a focus on ”Sustainability of renewable
resources”, it also ”recognizes efficiency improvements, cost improvements, the
opening of new markets and the underlying research”.[8]
Nilsson isn’t worried about the risks of genetically engineered trees. He
claims that his GE fast-flowering trees will only be planted in sealed greenhouses.
Once he has produced high yielding trees, the flowering gene can be bred out
and the trees to be planted will not contain any foreign genes.[9]
But Nilsson’s activities are not limited to laboratory research. He is a board
member of SweTree Technologies, a Swedish biotechnology company. The company
specifically aims to provide products and technologies ”to improve the
productivity and performance properties of seedlings, wood and fiber” for the
pulp and paper industry.[10] Also on the board of SweTree Technologies is Björn
Hägglund, a former Deputy CEO at Stora Enso and a board member of the Marcus
Wallenberg Foundation[11]. Hägglund is the chair of the board of WWF
Sweden[12], which could explain why we don’t hear much criticism of GE trees
from WWF Sweden.
SweTree Technologies was formed in 1999 as a joint initiative of the Foundation
of Technology Transfer (Innovationsbron) in Umeå and the company Woodheads AB.
Innovationsbron aims to profit by commercialising Swedish research and
innovation. Woodheads AB was formed to handle the intellectual property from 44
researchers at the Umeå Plant Science Centre and the Royal Institute of
Technology in Stockholm. SweTree Technologies’ website boasts that it has ”the
right to all innovations in plant and forest biotechnology emanating from the
members of Woodheads”.[13]
SweTree Technologies is working on trees genetically engineered for increased
biomass growth, increased fibre length and to produce wood that is easier to
pulp (with more easily extracted lignin content).[14] Three Swedish forestry
companies (Sveaskog, Bergvik Skog and Holmen) are part-owners of SweTree
Technologies.[15] Clearly the GE trees developed by SweTree Technologies will
not remain in greenhouses. Once GE trees are planted it is inevitable that they
will cross with trees in forests. The impacts are unknown and irreversible.[16]
Nilsson has a vision of the future: ”Trees will be ’tailor-made’, clearly
earmarked for their end uses. Examples of these are fast-growing porous trees
for the pulp industry, trees with long wood fibres for the paper industry,
slow-growing trees for furniture manufacture.”[17] In reality this means vast
monocultures of genetically engineered trees. It has nothing to do with
sustainability or concern for the environment. It is about profit for industry.
References:
[1] ”Ove Nilsson”, interview by Eva Krutmeijer, Linnaeus300 website. http://www.linnaeus300.com/the-scientists/ove-nilsson/
[2] Eva Krutmeijer, ”How far may we go in manipulating plants?”, Linnaeus300
website. http://www.linnaeus300.com/the-questions/manipulating-plants/
[3] Louise Williams, ”By gum, it just might be a solution”, Sydney Morning
Herald, 19 July 2007. http://www.smh.com.au/news/science/by-gum-it-might-just-be-a-solution/2007/07/18/1184559867261.html
[4] Louise Williams, ”By gum, it just might be a solution”, Sydney Morning
Herald, 19 July 2007. http://www.smh.com.au/news/science/by-gum-it-might-just-be-a-solution/2007/07/18/1184559867261.html
[5] See ”Agrofuels: Towards a reality check in nine key areas, Transnational
Institute, July 2007. http://www.tni.org/detail_pub.phtml?know_id=188
[6] ”Discovery on regulation of flowering is awarded the Marcus Wallenberg
Prize 2007”, Marcus Wallenberg Prize website, 6 February 2007. http://www.mwp.org/index.cfm?PageAction=ReadMore&id=26
[7] ”Dr. Marcus Wallenberg”, Marcus Wallenberg Prize website. http://www.mwp.org/founder.cfm?oppen=0,0&Rad=1&Pil=1
[8] ”The Marcus Wallenberg Prize”, Marcus Wallenberg Prize website. http://www.mwp.org/index.cfm?oppen=1,0&Rad=1&Pil=0
[9] Louise Williams, ”By gum, it just might be a solution”, Sydney Morning
Herald, 19 July 2007.
Eva Krutmeijer, ”How far may we go in manipulating plants?”, Linnaeus300
website. http://www.smh.com.au/news/science/by-gum-it-might-just-be-a-solution/2007/07/18/1184559867261.html
http://www.linnaeus300.com/the-questions/manipulating-plants/
[10] ”Putting more value into trees and wood fibres”, SweTree Technologies
website. http://www.swetree.com/index.html
[11] ”Board of Directors”, SweTree Technologies website.
Board of Directors Marcus Wallenberg Prize website. http://www.swetree.com/company/boards.html
http://www.mwp.org/directors/index.cfm?call=bod
[12] ”WWF in Sweden”, WWF Sweden website. http://www.wwf.se/show.php?id=1020540
[13] ”Woodheads Research”, SweTree Technologies website.
”Mendel Biotechnology and SweTree Technologies extend their collaboration”,
SweTree Technologies press release, 12 April 2007. http://www.swetree.com/research/woodheads-research.html
http://www.swetree.com/press-releases/mendel-biotechnology-and-swetree-technologies-extend-their-collabor.html
[14] Transgenic trees”, SweTree Technologies website. http://www.swetree.com/application-areas/transgenic-trees.html
[15] ”Three Swedish Forestry Companies Invest in SweTree”, SweTree Technologies
press release, 9 November 2006. http://www.swetree.com/press-releases/three-swedish-forestry-companies-invest-in-swetree.html
[16] See Chris Lang, ”Genetically Modified Trees: The Ultimate Threat to
Forests”, World Rainforest Movement and Friends of the Earth International,
December 2004. http://chrislang.blogspot.com/2004_12_23_chrislang_archive.html
- Risks
[17] Eva Krutmeijer, ”How will we use trees in the future?””, Linaeus300
website. http://www.linnaeus300.com/the-questions/trees-in-the-future/
070827 GE Trees Irreversible Damage to Forest
AUTHOR: Chris Lang
URL: http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/
Published in WRM Bulletin 121, August 2007 http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/121/viewpoint.html
please read more about GE tree at: http://chrislang.org/tag/ge-trees/
-----------------------------
via GENET, 070913
|